
Purpose: This narrative review evaluates the 2026 CAD/CAM material landscape, examining mechanical properties, clinical indications, workflows, and comparative performance of zirconia-based ceramics, PICNs, resin nanoceramics, High-performance polymers, and bioactive materials.
Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (2015–2026) identified studies on clinical performance, mechanical characterization, and material-specific outcomes. Data extraction focused on flexural strength, fracture toughness, marginal adaptation, survival rates, and manufacturing requirements.
Results: Lithium disilicate and zirconia remain benchmarks for high-strength applications, with multilayer zirconia achieving dentin-like strength and enamel-like translucency. Hybrid ceramics and PICNs offer favorable machinability and biomimetic elastic moduli but are limited to single-unit restorations due to moderate flexural strength (150–300 MPa). Resin nanoceramics provide excellent chairside efficiency without sintering, though long-term data remain limited. High-performance polymers such as PEEK and fiber-reinforced composites are gaining traction for implant-supported prostheses due to shock-absorbing properties and biocompatibility.
Conclusion: The 2026 CAD/CAM portfolio offers tailored solutions across restorative indications. Material selection should be guided by mechanical demands, esthetics, manufacturing constraints, and biological compatibility rather than universal application. Future developments in bioactive and self-healing materials are expected to expand digital restoration boundaries. (Open J Biomed Res 2026;5:17-26)
Vancouver (ICMJE)